The Simplest Chaotic Attractor
![]() |
Spiral chaos in Rössler's equations. Parameter values are a = 0.15; b = 0.2; c = 10.0). |
In 1976, Otto Rössler(1) set out to formulate the simplest continuous dynamical system he could thinkcapable of generateing chaotic solutions. The resulting three equations are
dx/dt = -(y + z)
dy/dt = x + a y
dz/dt = b + x z - c z
where a, b and c are parameters. In the case shown here (spiral chaos), the asymptotic dynamics lie on what amounts to a Mobius strip with a single twist. (2)
In detail, trajectories on the central disk spiral outward from a saddle focus of index 2.(3) Eventually, they rise up in the z-direction and are then folded back down again. The disk itself is composed of an infinite number of layers, but these are so compressed that trajectories based at different initial conditions become effectively identified. The results are effective irreversibility and sensitivity to initial conditions, the hallmark of chaotic motion.
The animation shown here views a single, post-transient solution curve from
a succession of angles, giving the illusion of a spinning attractor.
The Rössler attractor "lives" in three dimensions. But because the central
disk is essentially two-dimensional, the sequence of orbital excursions can be
specified by a one-dimensional "return" map. To construct the map, we proceed
as follows:
Unimodal return map computed from the Poincaré section.
1. Poincaré Section. First, we generate a Poincaré section
by slicing the attractor as shown in the accompanying figure. Here (right side)
the red line represents a plane normal to the page and the green crosses
successive intersections of the asymptotic solution and the plane.
2. Parameterization. Fitting the intersections to a polynomial
regression, we next assign to each point a distance, di, from one
end of the section.
3. Display. Finally, we imagine that there exists a function,
F(), such that di+1 = F(di), and plot i.e.,
di+1 vs. di for all pairs of points, i
and i+1.
The surprising result of this procedure is that the resulting return map is
reminiscent of the logistic and other unimodal maps which may therefore be
viewed as models of continuous chaos when the phase space is strongly
contracting.(4) A topologically equivalent construction
(next amplitude map)
is obtainable by plotting successive maxima (or minima), Maxi+1 vs. Maxi, in the
time series, x(t), y(t) or z(t).
Stretching and Folding
The geometric basis of chaos is stretching and folding. The results are
(1) trajectorial divergence, i.e., solutions based at nearby points separate, and (2)
the identification of trajectories based at points distant from each other. Stretching and
folding in the Rössler attractor is to view the evolution of the Poincaré section as the
slicing plane is rotated through 360°. In the accompanying animation
(click here),
one can observe the section as it stretches out and then folds back down on itself. In effect, the
nonlinear, dynamical baker rolls out the dough and folds it; rolls out the dough and folds it, ...
Phase Coherence
Power spectrum computed from {x(t)} for
spiral chaos in Rössler's equations. The peaks are "instrumentally" sharp.
Stretching results in trajectorial divergence while folding
causes mixing - two essential attributes of chaos which, in turn, give rise to
"sensitivity to initial conditions." Sensitivity to initial conditions is
what makes chaotic systems so special. Because one can never characterize a
system's initial state to infinite precision, it follows that long-term chaotic
evolution can never be predicted.
(5)
The best that one can do is to observe that there will be a probability
distribution according to which neihborhoods of an attractor are vistited.
Occasionally, this "invariant measure," can be calculated from a formula,
(6)
but, in general, this is not possible.
In the Rössler attractor, stretching and folding is largely confined
to curves radiating outward from the saddle focus at the center of the disk.
It follows that the motion is phase coherent, which is to say that
there is very little azimuthal divergence, even though trajectories are
thoroughly mixed radially.
(7)
Coherence in the phase space is reflected in the power spectrum by the presence
of instrumentally sharp peaks superposed on a noisy background as
shown at the right. By "instrumentally sharp," we mean that the peaks are no broader tha one expects
from finite sampling.
Rössler coined the term "spiral chaos" to decribe the geometry induced by
his equations. As it turns out, spiral chaos is the simplest form of chaos
observable in continuous dynamical systems. Although the term has never been
made mathematically precise, its essential attributes are those illustrated
above:
1. Motion on a 2+ dimensional attractor from which one
can extract a unimodal return map which predicts the sequence of
orbital excursions.
2. Phase coherent dynamics as reflected by sharp peaks in the power
spectrum
3. Minimal azimuthal mixing as nearby trajectories move round the
attractor.
Subsequently, Rössler discovered a more complicated form of chaos in
his equations. He called this behavior "screw" chaos because trajectories
leaving the central disk exhibit one or more additional loops before returning.
The loops are generated as trajectories leaving the vicinity of the saddle
focus near the origin come under the influence of a second saddle focus of
index 1. As trajectories approach this second equilibrium they spiral in
toward the one-dimensional unstable manifold before being shot back toward the
origin. In other words, screw chaos in Rössler's equations results from
the interaction of saddle foci of differing index.
The change in attractor geometry has a number of consequences:
Rössler Chaos in Other Contexts
Ecology.
Both spiral and screw chaos have been observed
(8)
in Lotka-Volterra models in which there is a keystone predator.
(9)
Here, species diversity at the victim trophic level is promoted by predators,
the presence of which prevents one victim species from outcompeting another.
Ecologists typically formulate the concept in terms of equilibria, but fixed
point behavior is not necessary. The two forms of Rössler chaos are
also observed in three-level food chain models
(10)
in which, for example, vegetation is consumed by herbivores and herbivores by
carnivores.
The picture at the right is an example of screw chaos in a
keystone predator model. The colors indicate the velocity of the evolving
trajectory (red signifies slow; violet, fast).
Chemical Oscilators.
One of the first experimental observations of chaos was reported by Roux
et al.
(11)
for the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction. These authors used the so-called
"method of delays (based on Floris Takens'
(12)
embedding theorems) to generate three-dimensional trajectories from univariate
time series. From the trajectories, they constructed unimodal return maps by
taking Poincaré sections.
Spiral chaos also appears to be present in the peroxidase-oxidase reaction
which is the simplest biochemical oscillator evidencing complex behavior. In
this case, a detailed chemical model consisting of ten coupled differential
equations gives good agreement with the experimental observations.
(13)
The figure at the right displays a unimodal return map induced by the model
in the region of spiral chaos. The experimental results, while somewhat messier,
are surprisingly similar.
(14)
Infinite Dimensional Systems.
Both delay and partial differential equations (DDEs, PDEs) are equivalent to
ordinary differential equations (ODEs) of infinite order and, thus, to systems
consisting of an infinte number of ODEs. Even though the dimension of the
phase space in these cases is infinite, low dimensional dynamics are often
observed. Examples of Rössler-like chaos in infinite-dimensional systems
can be found in the papers by Mackey and Glass
(15)
and Kuramoto.
(16)
Exercises
1. Rössler's equations have two equilibria. Compute them and show that
that one is a saddle focus of index 2 and the other a saddle focus of index 1.
Recall that the index of a fixed point is the number of unstable directions,
i.e., as reflected by the dimension of the unstable eigenspace.
2. Describe how one might visualize the stable and unstable manifolds of
the equilibria numerically.
3. If you have access to a computer which can be programmed to do this sort
of thing, implement your ideas in software and generate said visualization.
Notes and References
1. Rössler, O. E. 1976. An equation for continuous
chaos. Phys. Lett. 35A:397-398.
2. Abraham, R. D. and C. D. Shaw. 1982-1985.
Dynamics: The Geometry of Behavior. Vols. 1-3. Aerial Press. Santa
Cruz, CA.
3. The index of a fixed point refers to the dimension
of its unstable manifold - in this case, 2. A second saddle focus of index 1
(one unstable direction) can be found away from the origin in the direction of
z > 0.
4. In their famous paper, "Period Three Implies Chaos,"
Li and Yorke (Li, T. Y. and J. M. Yorke. 1975. Period Three Implies Chaos.
Amer. Math. Monthly, 82: 985.) motivate their discussion of
the logistic map by recalling that Lorenz (Lorenz, E. N. 1963. Deterministic
nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Phys. 357:130-141.) was able to
extract an effectively one-dimensional map from his famous model of convective
flow. Historically, interest in chaos in 1-D maps traces to the seminal paper of
Sir Robert May (May, R. M. 1976. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics.
Nature. 261: 459-467).
5. This provides us with a working definition of G-d:
"Only G-d can predict the indefinite time evolution of a chaotic system
because only G-d can specify the initial conditions to infinite precision -
which is what long-term prediction requires.
6. For example, in the case of the logistic map,
X' = rX(1-X), the invariant measure when r = 4 is
A readable discussion of invariant measures can be found in Lichtenberg, A.
J. and M. A. Lieberman. 1983. Regular and Stochastic Motion.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, the second edition of which was subsequently published
as Regular and Chaotic Motion by the same house.
7. Farmer, D., Crutchfield, J., Froehling, H., Packard,
N. and R. Shaw. 1980. Power spectra and mixing properties of strange attractors.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.357: 453-472.
8. Gilpin, M. E. 1979. Spiral chaos in a predator prey
model. Amer. Natur. 113: 306-308. See also, Schaffer, W. M.
1985. Order and chaos in ecological systems. Ecology. 66:
93-106.
9. Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species
diversity. Amer. Natur. 100: 65-75.
10. Hastings, A. and Powell.
11.Roux, J.-C., Simoyi, R. H. and H. L. Swinney. 1983.
Observation of a strange attractor. Physica 8D: 257-266.
12. Takens, F. 1981. Detecting strange attractors in
turbulence. Pp.366-381. In, Rand, D. A. and L.-S. Young (eds.)
Dynamical Systems and Turbulence. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. The
significance of Takens' work is not to be underestimated. By providing a link
between motion on a manifold and the time series which result from monitoring
a single "read-out" variable, Takens' results give experimentalists
entreé to the phase space, the stage on which dynamical dramas are
enacted.
13. Bronnikova, T. V., Fed'kina, V. R., Schaffer, W. M.
and L. F. Olsen. 1995. Period-doubling bifurcations in a detailed model of the
peroxidase-oxidase reaction. J. Phys. Chem. 99: 9309-9312.
Although the BZ reaction is unquestionably the most famous chemical oscillator,
it was in the peroxidase- oxidase reaction that complex dynamics were first
observed experimentally. For a review of some of the early work on chaos in
biology, see Olsen, L. F. and Degn, H. 1985. Chaos in biological systems.
Q. Rev. Biol. 18: 165-225.
14. More convincing is the fact that the model correctly
predicts the observed bifurcation sequences under a variety of experimental
conditions. (Hauser et al. 1997. J. Phys. Chem.; Bronnikova
et al. 1998. J. Phys. Chem. .
15. Mackey, M. C. and L. Glass. 1977. Oscillations and
chaos in physiological control systems. Science. 197: 287-289.
See also Farmer, J. D. 1982. Chaotic attractors of an infinite-dimensional
dynamical system. Physica 4D: 366-393.

Poncaré section (left) induced by slicing the attractor
with a plane (red line) normal to the page (right). Points (left) on the
section (green crosses, right) approximate a one-dimensional curve.


The Turn of the Screw
1. The return map, while remaining effectively one-dimensional,
loses its unimodal character. Instead, one observes multiple peaks. each of
which corresponds to another loop as trajectories are spun around by the
second saddle.
2. Peaks in the power spectrum broaden and eventually cease to be
peaks.
3. Mixing proceeds both radially and azimuthally.